I love reading classic science fiction like A Princess of Mars or 1984. Its always fun to see what the author thought the world of the future, or in the case of 1984 the world of the future past, would … Continue reading

‘John Carter’ Himself Talks About His Upcoming Sci-FI Epic

I love reading classic science fiction like A Princess of Mars or 1984. Its always fun to see what the author thought the world of the future, or in the case of 1984 the world of the future past, would be like. In most cases they are great stories that transcend time, which is exactly what Disney is hoping is the case with Edgar Rice Burrough’s A Princess of Mars, now retitled John Carter because apparently Disney doesn’t think men will go to a movie with the word “Princess” in the title.

Friday Night LIghts’ Taylor Kitsch is in the title role and between takes he took some time to talk with Total Film about playing Carter:

“It’s the most physical role I’ve ever done. It’s beyond gruelling for me. I’m basically in every scene. You can see the action on it. The main thing I’ve learned is energy conservation.

“The script says things like: ‘He jumps from here to there and he fights these guys. You write it off when your reading it, but when you do it, it’s a whole day’s shoot. When John gets to Mars, everything is life and death.

“It’s a character-driven epic adventure rather than just crazy effects.”

Pixar alum Andrew Stanton is making his live action debut with John Carter. Up until now he’s only directed animated films such as Wall-E and Finding Nemo. It’ll be interesting to see if Stanton can follow in the footsteps of fellow Pixar director Brad Bird (The IncrediblesMission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol) and make as seamless a transition.

What do you think of John Carter? I try to reserve judgement until I see the entire film, but I have to admit, so far the trailers haven’t exactly wowed me. To be completely honest, I think it’s going to bomb spectacularly. I hope it doesn’t, but the outlook isn’t good.

John Carter drops into theatres March 9. The cast includes Kitsch, Lynn Collins (she and Kitsch both appeared in X-Men Origins: Wolverine, although I don’t believe they shared any screen time), Willem Dafoe, Bryan Cranston, Mark Strong, Ciaran Hines, Thomas Hayden Church, Smantha Morton and James Purefoy.

SOURCE: Total Film

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Al-K/511619482 Al K

    Wall e and finding nemo were both great character driven films, and i have no doubt this wont be any diffrent. How ever, i agree with you that this film might bomb, because its being marketed as a star wars prequel/ avatar rip off, and thats to me going to kill it!  I suspect it might do decent, then drop off huge after the first week, and be consitered a bomb, but if its done well it might turn into one of those underground cult sci fi classics!

  • Philip Sticco

    Isn’t it ironic that people may think this is an Avatar rip off? I hope it does well. I’d love a new sci-fi franchise, however, unless it gets good word of mouth the second weekend dropoff could be huge. Assuming it even does well opening weekend.

  • Anonymous

    Simplely put, this should have been Marketed…
    As the Epic Classic story it is to generations of readers.
    What came before ‘Star Wars/Trek’ & ‘Avatar’, et al…
    One of the original master-works of imagination.
    But whatever, let’s f*cking call it John Carter…
    Because ‘Mars Needes Moms’ tanked or such nonsense…
    Pissing of the SciFi/Fantasy peeps, and not…
    Engaging the masses – with an innocuous title.
    And, poorly constructed trailers.

  • Anonymous

    Avatar lmao, funny because as lame as this Prince of Persia 2, it cant even begin to approach the size of a steaming load of shit that Avatar is. The avatards will keep on being fanboys though

  • Anonymous

    Prince of Persia 2

  • Anonymous

    LOL.

  • obijuanmartinez

    Just leafed through my 1979 Marvel Comics “John Carter: Warlord of Mars” Annual, written by Chris Claremont. The inside cover has a mail-in offer for the Gold Cylon Centurion FREE w/ 4 clipped-out proof-of-purchase tags from Mattel BSG action figures. Nice!

    Avatar = Epileptic shit sandwich

  • Anonymous

    Waaah…Avatar makes almost 3Billion Dollars.  Waaah…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_V4XGPDEZPVHQBGIRBJECTTC35M John

    Without reading this article let me guess

    He said:  I hated this film – I think it was poorly written and poorly directed and my agent is a moron and I’m unhappy with this career choice.

    Oh…was I wrong?

    Puhlease…this is all PR-flack-coached material man.  This is “news”?  Be real son.  For real real?  Yeah, for real!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_V4XGPDEZPVHQBGIRBJECTTC35M John

    1984 = DHS, SOPA, INDEFINITE DETENTION OF U.S. CITIZENS SANS TRIAL / NDAA  (NAT’L DEF AUTH ACT)

    WARRANTLESS GPS ON YOUR CAR – IF YOU HAVE 48 HOURS WORTH OF FOOD YOU ARE A “POTENTIAL TERRORIST”

    IF YOU DISSENT WITH THE GOVERNMENT YOU ARE A “POTENTIAL TERRORIST”

    Contant Wars, check

    Economic devasation, check

    High unemployment, check

    Oh, hang on, we’re in 1984 already!

  • Anonymous

    by that measure its the best movie and Transformers should have an oscar…go whine simpleton

  • Anonymous

    The only whining bitch is you.  Waaah!!!  Alien, Aliens, Terminator2, Blade Runner and many others didn’t win an Oscar either simpleton.  No one gives an as rat about an Oscar simple minded kid.  Waaah!!!!

  • Anonymous

    The only big movies that “bomb spectacularly” are ones that are also universally panned by critics i.e. Heaven’s Gate, Dune, Waterworld, Green Lantern etc. This movie has already been screened and received overwhelmingly positive reaction. Chances are it’s gonna be good. I challenge you to find a big blockbuster type of film with a fresh-rating at RT that ever bombed spectacularly.

  • Anonymous

    I dont fall for trolling which is clearly what youre doing :) Now what s it you geeks call it again?   PWND

  • Anonymous

    Transformers was  trashed by critics…

  • http://twitter.com/sideshowRaheem sideshowRaheem

    You’re both somewhat right, big movies like Transformers get terrible reviews but still make money but you never see a movie with this kind of budget that also gets overwhelmingly positive reviews do poorly at the box office. It’s clear Disney is botching the marketing so far so John Carter will live or die by it’s reviews. If it gets between 80 and 100% on Rotten Tomatoes it’ll make bank but anything under 75% and they’ll be in trouble. 

  • Anonymous

    Well they have the cheap Beauty and the Beast 3D to fall back on, and its cashing in.