Director James Mangold spoke to Empire Magazine about The Wolverine, and the most striking piece of information gleaned from their interview is something that’s been presumed to be true since the project’s inception and has now been proven false. The … Continue reading

Surprise, Surprise: ‘The Wolverine’ Is NOT A Prequel

Director James Mangold spoke to Empire Magazine about The Wolverine, and the most striking piece of information gleaned from their interview is something that’s been presumed to be true since the project’s inception and has now been proven false.

The Wolverine IS NOT a prequel film.

That’s weird!  Considering set photos have shown scenes that clearly take place during WWII and with the recent rumor that Famke Janssen filmed a cameo reprising her role as Jean Grey, the timeline of this story is all over the place.

The director attempts to clear up the fogginess:

“Where this film sits in the universe of the films is after them all.  Jean Grey is gone, most of the X-Men are disbanded or gone, so there’s a tremendous sense of isolation for him.”

He adds:

“That’s something that for me was very important, that I land in a very specific place in his timeline. I wanted to be able to tell the story without the burden of handing it off to a film that already exists and having to conform to it. The ideas of immortality reign very heavily in this story and the burden of immortality weighs heavily on Logan. For me that’s such an interesting part of Logan’s character that is nearly impossible to explore if you have a kind of league or team movie.”

Mangold succinctly describes the film:

“Japanese noir picture with tentpole action in it.”

The Wolverine hits theaters July 26, 2013.

Source: Empire

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Yuzuru-Nomura/1502485636 Yuzuru Nomura

    Matt, for Christe’s sake, put a fucking “spoiler alert” in the there you fucking idiot!

  • John

    yes, keep reading movie news to stay completely unaware on plot points..

  • myclawismypenis

    Better be some claw slashing, samurai sword clashing action….I dont really care what the timeline is. Butttt, it did remind me of old man logan

  • Dexx

    The title alone was a giveaway to those of us with common sense that the article would likely discuss what makes the movie not a prequel and that spoilers may be used to explain that. Just because you lacked the sense to figure that out doesn’t make Matt an “idiot.”

  • Pingback: Curious New Pic of ‘The Wolverine’ | Latino-Review.com

  • http://twitter.com/thepozr Preston

    Who’s Christe? And yeah, title alone should’ve been enough of a hint for you.

  • Xmasevebaby

    If the first trailer doesn’t invoke memories of Kill Bill, Vol. 1, call me ‘disinterested.’

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Yuzuru-Nomura/1502485636 Yuzuru Nomura

    Exactly what justifies the fact that just because the article title mentions that this movie is not a prequel (but rather a sequel from a chronological perspective) that mentioning “specific” cameos won’t be a spoiler, huh, John, Dexx (whoever you are) and Preston? I guess you guys were above the morons who didn’t mind knowing Liam Neeson’s special appearance in The Dark Knight Rises before watching it, rather than the majority of people who were unaware and surprised by it and enjoyed it even more. Think (if you can) before preaching about common sense, because obviously you guys lack it. As a sidenote and measure for GOOD JOUNALISM, both movie-info-sites “ComingSoon.net” and “Collider” either put a spoiler alert before the aforementioned cameo reveal or simply didn’t mention it at all. So you morons can stick to your shit-hole for movie info and be spoiled all you want, because you’re too retarted to even know the difference and/or notice it.

  • rsixsmith

    i’m worried about the phrase “tentpole action”. but i also like “japanese noir picture”.