There might be a galactic rivalry between two banner groups of Sci-fi titles: “Star Wars” and “Star Trek.” Though it is not a rivalry in enmity, it seems to be one in friendly competition. In an interview with Empire Magazine, … Continue reading

Trek Crew Talks ‘Star Wars’

star-trek-set-photo-jj-abrams-01

There might be a galactic rivalry between two banner groups of Sci-fi titles: “Star Wars” and “Star Trek.” Though it is not a rivalry in enmity, it seems to be one in friendly competition.

In an interview with Empire Magazine, the architect for the new series of “Trek” movies, J.J. Abrams, gave his thoughts on both franchises. “There were the very early conversations and I quickly said that because of my loyalty to Star Trek, and also just being a fan, I wouldn’t even want to be involved in the next version of those things. I declined any involvement very early on,” says Abrams. “I’d rather be in the audience not knowing what was coming, rather than being involved in the minutiae of making them.”

Abrams himself did add playful fuel to the fire saying: “I guess the franchises could go up against each other, but I’m not thinking that far ahead.” Maybe believing that a future installment for his “Star Trek” series could go up against the beginnings of the inevitable blockbuster which will be the continuation of Star Wars. The producer was quite cordial to the other franchise, though: “I’m a huge fan of Star Wars, Empire and Jedi, and the idea of the world continuing is exciting and will be amazing. Kathy Kennedy is a friend and there are no smarter producers. It’s in great hands.”

Empire Magazine also got a quote from Chris Pine concerning whether his work would include George Lucas’ masterwork. Though he has signed onto the Trek franchise he adds: “But there’s obviously room for both Star Trek and Star Wars. We both have plenty of things to offer sci-fi. But I’m not saying any more that that! There are more than enough Star Wars stories around at the moment!”

It seems both sides are content at the moment where they stand. It would seem though; having any Enterprise members aboard the Star Wars franchise would be too close for comfort. “Star Wars VII” might be still in the works, but “Star Trek Into Darkness” will zoom into theaters May 2013.

 

  • http://twitter.com/MediaCritiquer MediaCritiquer.com

    To boldly go…no where. These new ST films don’t go anywhere. This sequel is based on Earth. The first film was based on Vulcan. Hardly new territory.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=768069601 Alec Grimes

    I partly agree with you here; but to say that Trek doesn’t go anywhere…is an understatement. Just because a story is set on earth, does not mean there isn’t a story to tell. After all, Trek is foremost about the human condition…the characters…ect. Star wars is steeped more in Fantasty like Lord Of The Rings.
    The two are different, but both still have great stories as well Characters. I can say that the prequel Star Wars didn’t go anywhere, because the truth is, we all knew the story. The prequels didn’t really need to be told; and after the execution of those films, I wish they hadn’t bothered to make them.

  • Ethan

    What are you talking about? There was some of the movie on Vulcan. But it wasn’t about Vulcan. And yea, Nero was headed to Earth (it *is* the Federation HQ… the organization he vowed vengeance to). But, hey, if you just want to say these films are centered around Earth, let’s do the math:

    Star Trek movies where Earth is involved:
    Star Trek TMP
    The Wrath of Khan
    Star Trek III: The Search For Spock
    Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (Earth)
    Star Trek V
    Star Trek VI
    Star Trek: Generations
    Star Trek: First Contact (practically the entire movie)
    Star Trek: Nemesis

    The only movie where Earth doesn’t play a large role is Star Trek: Insurrection. And that’s the only turd in the whole franchise!

    Yikes, dude.

  • Grey_Pilgrim

    Your point being? A good yarn is a good yarn, they need not always go to a ‘Galbana 3′ to be interesting

  • Bob

    No offense, but you used the word “understatement” incorrectly. The way you have it, you’re actually agreeing that Trek doesn’t go anywhere.